By: Myriam Akbar
A week ago, The Mummy was released in theaters and audiences can agree on one thing—that the disgusting and gory scenes effectively made their stomachs turn. Written and directed by Lee Cronin, the film acts as a reimagining of the original Universal monster story. The plot follows a family’s reunion with their previously missing daughter, Katie, after she is mysteriously discovered in a catatonic state. Desperate for answers, her journalist father investigates her disappearance and her nurse mother attempts to heal her at home. While many viewers praised the grotesque nature of The Mummy, some felt it was all the film had to offer. There was a lot of criticism pertaining to the runtime and the lack of decision-making skills demonstrated by the characters. Audiences also compared the film to The Exorcist and Evil Dead Rise, suggesting there was an overall lack of originality.
As for myself, I will begin with the positives. The tension built in the opening scene was expertly done. The use of intense sound immediately hooked me as a viewer, starting off strong with a jump-scare. Secondly, the visceral practical effects and body horror elements make for a thrilling and unnerving watch. Although saturated with them, the film creates moments of shock that are perfect for the theater experience. While on the extreme side, the gore used to illustrate the mummification is seemingly realistic for a half-preserved human body. For example, the peeling of discolored skin and wooden-like toenails that were almost impossible to clip. Another positive is the effort to make scenes appear as if they take place in Egypt. The primary film locations were Ireland and Spain, but there’s a clear strategy used to alter the audience's perception of geography through climate and aesthetics. Lastly, Cronin offers a unique twist on the mummification aspect of the film. This approach, compared to the Universal Monsters version and the 1999 loose remake, isn’t historically accurate. However, it’s innovative and the nature of what happened to Katie is viciously brutal. I agree with critics that the family dynamic part of the plot lacks originality, as well as the film relying heavily on horror tropes. However, the choice to have a child as the mummy is clever and adds a layer of obscurity. It also tugs on the emotion of the audience because I, for example, was rooting for her recovery throughout the entire film.
Without spoiling too much, I will say that my main negative criticism is the decision to extend Katie’s possessed behavior to other characters in the film. This took the focus off of the actual mummy and created a sense of inconsistency within the lore, as well as being unnecessary. An issue for many viewers, including myself, was the way the parents reacted to their daughter’s condition. To be specific, their actions after her return and overall sense of urgency. Their emotional response could have been an acting performance issue, but other moments were just awful script choices. For example, Katie being roughly dragged up the stairs in a wheelchair rather than having her body carried gently up to her room. This scene was confusing and unintentionally comedic—because what was that?
Cronin has a few upcoming projects, such as a supernatural film he has been working on for some time, Box of Bones. It has also been reported that he has an untitled mystery thriller project approaching with James Wan’s Atomic Monster, Blumhouse, and New Line. One thing we can know for certain is that he’ll deliver some gag-worthy practical effects and gore.













